1/19 – "Avatar 2: Avatard"

19 Jan

Well, I finally saw Avatar.  I’ll spare you my review.

What I did want to share was my rather offensive idea for a sequel.  Along with the help of a friend, here’s what we came up with.

In Avatar, Jake Sully (the lead) suffers from a physical disability, leaving him a paraplegic.

For the sequel, let’s go with a mentally challenged character instead — of course to be portrayed by Sean Penn.

k I guess I go to hell now :)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • http://mackthewriter.wordpress.com/ Debbi

    From what I’ve heard “Avatar” is a lot of stupid cliches made tolerable only by the overwhelming lot of 3-D special effects. Any truth to the rumor?

    • The Stabbing Pen

      In my opinion, yes. I found the movie entertaining and visually stunning, and didn’t even mind that it was 2 hours 40 minutes long. I did mind that the dialogue was poor, the characters were often cliches, and the story had plenty of holes. No reason it deserves best picture from the Golden Globes. I don’t believe in awards, but if I did, “best pictures” should certainly excel in all areas of filmmaking — which Avatar certainly did not.